>You have a definite bias against Nikon, which is fine by me. At least you're >open about it. However, you should be more forthcoming about the fact that >Polaroid has been providing you with a scanner, and that this may bias your >opinion towards their products.
I don't what bias the other person has or has not, Moreno. I do know that in the couple of months I've subscribed to this list there have been untold numbers of complaints voiced re problems with the Nikon in question. In that same period there has been no such outcry regarding equipment from other manufacturers, and not everyone on this list receives complimentary gear to play with so that argument strikes me as a ruse. If you want to talk about bias, what I've heard suggests that there are people are there buying Nikons _in spite of_ these issues solely for the reason they wish to associate themselves with the Nikon brand. That, and the fact that with the Nikon you can also get ICE packaged. For what it's worth I own the Polaroid SS4000 and have had no issues with it whatsoever other than the cheap quality/dubious design (make that very dubious) of its film holders, especially the negative film holder. Having revealed that, based on what I've read on this list my opinion of Nikon (the company) has dropped while my opinion of Polaroid (the company) has taken a jump up. Not because I now own a Polaroid but because of the way I perceive these companies and their respective quality-control and after-market support divisions, this based primarily on my second-hand gleanings from this list, partially on my personal experience with Polaroid support. That's this consumer's take. Tris ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners' or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or body