Well, if digital cameras fulfilled all the criteria, then film would have been gone a long time ago. Obviously, it still doesn't.
I haven't yet found a media card that stores the equivalent of 7400 megabytes (36-38 exposures at about 200 megs each), costs under $5, and fits into a canister that weighs about 2 ounces, and requires no energy source to maintain the latent image for years, have you? Art Preben S. Kristensen wrote: >>I'm still waiting for the reusable film that can be recharged after >the >> > images are taken off of it. > > Art, do you mean almost like a digital camera? :-) > > Preben > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners' or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or body
