It's not that unusual, though I don't recall why, and LZW compression will not reduce file size nearly as much as JPG
Maris ----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, June 09, 2002 4:32 PM Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Archiving and when to sharpen (was:Color spaces for differentpurposes) [snipped] The reason I ask is that I just compared a scanned photograph of > 3591 X 5472 pixel size saved in several formats. The results were: > > TIFF 36,498 kb > TIFF with lwz compression 36, 523 kb > JPG @ Photoshop level 12 17,633 kb Wow, are you sure? The LZW TIFF was *larger*? That's unusual. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners' or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or body
