Preben writes: > I would be interested in knowing which photos > ARE worth protecting.?
The ones that are worth money. > As far as I know, in the finest museums of the > world (for what it is worth), you may stumble across > (quote) sunsets, breaking waves, distant mountains, > nudes (unquote) . I've hardly ever seen such things in museums, except for nudes, and that's only because nudes are a euphemism for soft-core pornography. For every such photo in a museum, there's are thousands and thousands of similar photos for sale at bargain prices, or simply free for the asking. > Should we perhaps leave it to the *eyes of the > beholder*, instead of stooping to sweeping > generalisations. Since you cannot read the beholder's mind, how will you know which images he will steal, and which images he will not steal? > All copyrighted material deserves protection against > commercial pirating if the originator so wishes... Of course. But originators with an exaggerated opinion of their work and draconian methods of protecting it won't have too many people viewing their masterpieces. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners' or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or body
