That's potentially very unfortunate, too. Sounds like I am going to have to provide some type of written warranty if I distribute inkjet prints as collectibles. Up to now, I use an archival process for reproducing anything I sell (graphic art more than photos) or I have sold chemical (wet darkroom) photos. But I'm just beginning to set up for archival inkjet work, and I can see I will need to distinguish these from those which might fade in a short time period.
Art Paul D. DeRocco wrote: > Sounds like the art market has "learned" that inkjet prints fade just as > archival inkjet printers are becoming mainstream. > > -- > > Ciao, Paul D. DeRocco > Paul mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >>From: HPA >> >>Many young people who are trying to >>get art photography shows in this region are finding that even >>coffee shops >>will not hang inkjet prints anymore, they need real prints, and that art >>buyers are wising up and asking for fiber. >> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners' or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or body
