> If I Knew anything about running a list I'd start a "SCANNERS" list and have two or >three references - one as per Julian , one per Austin and one other. People could >choose who they wanted to believe. If this ongoing crap started up it certainly would >not be posted. Maybe they would then take their bitching somewhere else and then >leave the list for those of us who want to learn and further the discussion about scanning. > From: "JimD" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 2002/09/03 Tue AM 08:18:39 GMT+12:00 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [filmscanners] Re: dynamic range discussion > > At 08:37 PM 9/1/2002 -0700, Bruce wrote: > >Please, enough already with the dynamic range argument. I want to learn > >about scanners. > > > >Thanks. > >-bruce > > Bruce, > You've made a common mistake. > > Once upon a time, scanners were the focus of this list. > However, it has now become the domain for the all > important discussion of DYNAMIC RANGE. > The dynamic range storms tend to last for weeks but subside > once a dead horse gets beaten to pulp. > -JimD > > >
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners' or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or body
