>Preston wrote >When Photoshop converts from 16-bit to 8-bit it applies very fine noise >to try to control subsequent problems. Most scanners don't. I would have >expected this to make a difference but not to the point that the scanner >8-bit file would completely suck and the Photoshop 8-bit file would be >just as good as the 16- bit version. I don't know whether this is all a >function of Photoshop's superior algorithm or whether the scanner is >doing something bad. Furthermore, I don't care. One way or another, the >8-bit scanner file is bad and the 8-bit Photoshop file is good."
This is an interesting point. I too think Adobe may do better job of converting to 8bit than Vuescan. I will follow it. Thanks Ramesh ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners' or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or body