Karl writes, >But the claim that a 10D is better than film isn't supported >by the math or by visual inspection
That wasn't my claim: my claim was that 900x900 pixels of a 1Ds image look a lot better than 900x900 pixels of a 4000 dpi scanned image if you print them at the same size. Please don't put words in my mouth. Do you think that I'm wrong in that??? David J. Littleboy [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tokyo, Japan ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners' or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or body
