>I suggest you look for any detail removed with Digital ICE because there >will probably not be any detail removed. The reason the image may look >less sharp is because the eye is being tricked by the surface defects >(dust, scratches, etc.). There shouldn't be any residual silver in C-41 >processed film. The reason the eye is "tricked" is because the eye is >looking for the finest detail in the image to judge sharpness. In many >cases the finest details are the surface defects. When those are removed >the image appears less sharp when actually the image detail remains.
A simple test can provide the additional confirmation/refutation of this. Scan a negative with a film scanner that can do precise line repeat scanning, i.e. a film-scanner such as the LS-4000 etc. Do one scan with ICE on 'fine', another without 'ICE' pop both images into Photoshop. Superimpose one as a layer against the other and do a 'difference' mode for the layers. Images w/o ICE are noticeably sharper, though more dirty. For myself, it isn't that much of an issue except for a few scans so by default I use ICE, but for the most imp't scans, I don't use ICE and do scratch/detail repair by hand. Dieder ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners' or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or body