Date sent: Sat, 20 Nov 2004 15:12:13 -0600 Send reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: "Laurie Solomon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [filmscanners] RE: Genuine fractals?????
> I use the program frequently; and find that for most upsampling within the > normal ranges, it is not all that much different from Photoshop's Bicubic > methods. It is in the extreme ranges of upsampling that the difference may > begin to appe arandGFmaybegintoshine. > > What I do not understand is, if you are concerned with quality, why are you > saving your digital camera captures to a Jpeg format which uses lossy > compression and which most digital cameras will not let you save captures at > resolutions in the 300 ppi range but tend to limit one to capturing at > resolutions less than 300 ppi. If it were me, I would be saving the > captures to Tiff format files which most cameras allow to be saved at 300ppi > resolutions. My canon G2 digital does not offer the tiff option but offers Raw format which I believe can be converted to tif.Would such a conversion give me the benefit you mention ? Resolutions of 72 ppi are common for web use but not for > printing and especially not for large prints; and Jpeg format is used so > that the user can capture on one card more images (assuming that they will > only be used for viewing online or via monitors or will only be printed at 4 > x 6 sizes at best). > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners' or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or body
