Al, Yes, your replies (at least, the one to me) have seemingly gone AWOL. Messages to the list as a whole seem to have come through ok.
Glad to hear you've found pointers towards a solution. Once you figure out the solution, perhaps you could post it to the list with some before and after examples accessible on a website somewhere. Best, Carlisle On Feb 19, 2006, at 6:04 PM, "" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Art, > > >> I asked if the person's wife was using an LCD screen and if so, if >> the >> image had been set to the monitor's native resolution, but I have >> never heard any further feedback, so I didn't delve any further into >> it. > > I did reply to you on Friday but can't recall seeing it on the > list. I replied to the > other posters (Laurie, Carlisle and Francis) and those seem to be > AWOL as > well. > > I won't write too much here, in case it goes astray, but yes the > images have > been resized to match the native monitor resolution. Francis sent > some useful > links and I'm revisiting the whole issue of using sharpening > masks. These look > to be the key in getting the sort of results I'm after. > > > > Al Bond > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > ------------------ > Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe > filmscanners' > or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the > message title or body ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners' or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or body
