On Tuesday, November 11, 2003, at 11:34 AM, Michael Edwards wrote:
What would be unclear about that?
The fact that you had to describe what you regard as "repeated notes" - I
couldn't have been sure what you included and didn't include if you didn't
describe it.
Sure you could... because I regard *any* change as a disruption of the repetition. Therefore, the only notes that count as "repeated" are those that are obviously exactly the same as their predecessors.
*Any* change - be it octave, staff, clef, voice, or otherwise, breaks the repetition. Hard and fast. No ambiguities.
------------- Brad Beyenhof [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________ Finale mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
