On Wed, 14 Jul 2004 12:13:22 -0400, Christopher BJ Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 10:24 PM -0600 7/13/04, shirling & neueweise wrote: > >christopher, in all the cases i have seen using what are now > >commonly given the unfortunate name of "irrational" time signatures > >(*), the "whole" value implied is the whole note. 1/6 is indeed > >one-sixth of a whole note (quarter note triplet, as you wrote). > > Thank you. I am glad I have not been blowin' smoke all these years.
I haven't been following this thread all that closely, but I've come up with a question: in, for example, 3/6 meter, do you still have to mark the notes as three triplet quarters? Or does the 6 on the bottom imply that all quarters have quarter-triplet value? -- Brad Beyenhof [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://augmentedfourth.blogspot.com _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
