On 10 Jul 2005 at 15:33, Rocky Road wrote: > PS: The huge discussion of Sibelius 4 here is the first time I've seen > this list have more "hmmm interesting" rather than "not bad, but no > dice" posts. I don't remember the tenor of potential Sibelius > acceptance ever being as strong here before.
Seems to me that most of the "hmm, interesting" is coming from people who already had experience with Sibelius, and/or who are mostly just considering the dynamic parts, and not the program as a whole. When I delved into it, I quickly determined that I couldn't switch to Sibelius for a number of reasons, none of which had to do with the classic Finale-user criticisms of Sibelius (i.e., restricts formatting choices, or it can't do something Finale can do). -- David W. Fenton http://www.bway.net/~dfenton David Fenton Associates http://www.bway.net/~dfassoc _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
