I agree that this is silly. When you send an email to this list you are
going to sometimes have an email forwarded to an offlist member. You are
going to be quoted with attribution in other emails, perhaps to other lists.
It's part of the expected actions to be taken with an email, and these are
not illegal as far as I'm aware.

While the argument exists that since your post is © 2005 you, one must also
consider the value of the post. If someone wants to read your post all they
need to do is join the list and they can. Therefore, there is no undue harm
caused by someone archiving their received emails elsewhere, even if
publically accessible.

If you wish to have your posts not archived, then the correct protocaol in
email is to set the appropriate X-Header. Adding a © notice in your
signature is senseless - that is used in print for use by humans, but no
human is involved with the actual archiving of your post. Complaining about
archiving when the X-Header has not been set is kinda like whining about the
draft when you've left the door open.

Finally, the whole point of this list is to help others. Does it matter in a
real way whether the person is helped through the "official" archive or
another?

If there was some proprietary information or secrets or artistic worth or
such here, ok. But it's an email list. If someone thinks so highly of the
information we freely exchange here that they want to draw attention to it,
that's a compliment.

Neal Schermerhorn
_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

Reply via email to