Ultimately all that really matters is did they fix the data deletion issue (among other bugs but, that's a biggie). -A
> From: dhbailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: <finale@shsu.edu> > Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2006 19:11:11 -0500 > To: <finale@shsu.edu> > Subject: Re: [Finale] Automatic check for updates > > Randolph Peters wrote: > >>> I finally got a reply from MakeMusic tech support, and the case is >>> that the original 2006b updater contained an incorrect file, so there >>> was a NEW 2006b updater posted, and that is why my computer didn't >>> think that even though I have 2006b it isn't the most recent 2006b. >>> >>> If that isn't total confusion, then I don't know what is! Shouldn't >>> the "new" 2006b have been posted as 2006c so that everybody could be >>> sure they have the most recent? >>> >>> I dunno . . . >>> >>> David H. Bailey >> > > Yeah, I just found that out, and after installing it, ran the "check for > updates" thing, and it actually told me that I had the most recent version. > > The list of what they claimed to have fixed in 2006c looks suspiciously > like the list for 2006b, so I think they may have simply decided to go > with 2006c rather than 2006b2 (maybe they didn't leave enough spaces in > their code to be able to handle a version with that extra subversion > indicator.) > > Anyway, as you say, it's all moot now. > > > -- > David H. Bailey > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _______________________________________________ > Finale mailing list > Finale@shsu.edu > http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
