dc wrote:
David W. Fenton écrit:
The one thing that would be lost would be the "analytical" value of
the older notation, which tells you "this is exactly the same music
that you're playing both times" whereas writing it out does not tell
you that immediately.
The second thing that would be lost is the possibility for the player to
easily omit a repeat.
While that "easily" is true, it still won't prevent such actions, and if
the music truly is an exact repeat, it will just lead many performers to
ask why waste so much paper and introduce unnecessary page turns when
repeat signs could have just as easily been used?
Face it, there's no way to guarantee that any performance will even come
close to what we as composers/arrangers imagined unless we are actively
involved in the performance.
--
David H. Bailey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
