If it were part of a melodic line, I'd probably avoid the open-string
harmonic, too.  Not just for the reasons mentioned, but because it is
often much easier to play with a sustained sound, with shifting of the
consistent 1-4 handshape, instead of switching from 1-4 to 0-3 as needed
for the open string.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christopher Smith
> Sent: 11 September 2006 12:56
> To: finale@shsu.edu
> Subject: Re: [Finale] artificial or natural harmonic notation?
> 
> 
> It's been my experience that string players pretty much universally  
> ignore my helpful notations about how to play harmonics, and unless  
> it is impossible, will always play an artificial harmonic 
> rather than  
> a natural one. They explain that it is for tuning, as you can't tune  
> a natural harmonic; and for timbre, as the sound of an open 
> string is  
> substantially different from a stopped one.
> 
> Regardless, the notation with the diamond a 4th higher is perfectly  
> correct, even on an open string, though as I said, most players will  
> probably play it on the next lower string so that it will be an  
> artificial harmonic in any case.
> 
> Christopher
> 
> 
> On Sep 10, 2006, at 11:30 PM, Randolph Peters wrote:
> 
> > I was puzzling over a notational problem I had regarding 
> artificial  
> > and natural harmonics notation on a stringed instrument.
> >
> > I have a section in a piece I'm writing where the violin soloist  
> > plays a series of artificial harmonics (P4 above). When the 
> passage  
> > comes to an open string, I've usually thought of those notes as  
> > being natural harmonics. The thing is that the traditional 
> notation  
> > for natural harmonics looks odd and jumps out at you.
> >
> > Should I carry on with the artificial harmonics notation (a note  
> > and a diamond a P4th above) or should I mix the two kinds of  
> > harmonics notation? [Let's assume the player is using an open  
> > string and not a fingered version of the same note.]
> >
> > I appeal to the wisdom of the list.
> >
> > -Randolph Peters
> > _______________________________________________
> > Finale mailing list
> > Finale@shsu.edu
> > http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Finale mailing list
> Finale@shsu.edu
> http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
> 

_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

Reply via email to