"Williams, Jim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
A question arises, though: why are these attachments viewed by some people > as (ob)noxious? I could see an issue, perhaps, if people are on dialup or > billed by the byte, but the attachments are actually quite small, yes??
Having broadband, I'm relaxed about attachments, but your posts (and many others) have about 15% signal to 85% noise, and it takes time to scroll onto the next message.
-- Ken Moore _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
