Bruce K H Kau / 2006/11/26 / 01:32 PM wrote: >What I meant to say >(without trying to be too technical) is that the characters themselves >were mapped into the same character address-space as the 7-bit ASCII >characters
Oh, I see. Then it must be single byte. >I totally understand that native readers prefer the Kanji over the >phonetic. No, no. That's not what I meant. I meant single byte Katakana are difficult to read compared to double byte ones. For example, 'dakuten' becomes additional byte so they appear as if they are two characters. I actually lied. I realized Windows still supports single byte Katakana by F8 conversion, but Microsoft GUI Guideline does prohibit the use of single byte Katakana. -- - Hiro Hiroaki Honshuku, A-NO-NE Music, Boston, MA <http://a-no-ne.com> <http://anonemusic.com> _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
