On 22 Mar 2007, at 6:18 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:

On 22 Mar 2007 at 13:11, Darcy James Argue wrote:

Just to be clear, I agree with this -- as you say, historical forms
in which the numbering system you describe is what's expected. But I
would never recommend that this numbering system be used for a piece
of new music.

Well, if you'll reread what I actually posted in this thread, you'll
see that I never advocated that.

Nor did I claim, or intend to imply, that you had.

Cheers,

- Darcy
-----
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brooklyn, NY



_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

Reply via email to