On 4/15/07, David W. Fenton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
To Kim: didn't you have a very similar example of just such a triplet subdivision that wasn't clearly indicated that you posted earlier?
Yes, in fact I think it was a bit more complex than this latest example-- btw my editor agreed with your suggestion for that previous sample--remember some here on the list suggested I should leave the notation as it was presented in the manuscript, but you suggested I should bring it up to modern notation habits-- which is exactly what my editor said. Thanks much Kim _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
