Darcy James Argue wrote:
Substantial, specific criticism is not the same as knee-jerk dismissal.

Don devoted his life to playing uncompromising and person music in the face of considerable hostility and hardship. Whether you like his music or not, he's an influential figure in the evolution of the music and deserves respect as such. It's ridiculous to say that the guy responsible for teaching Dave Holland (who is in many respects a modern-day Don Ellis figure) how to play complicated time signatures "wasn't into meter," even in jest.

I mean, whatever you might think of, oh I don't know -- John Cage, let's say -- it would be idiotic to say that "he was barely into composing."


I can accept that. But having heard Don Cherry perform live, I can say that the assessment, at least from what I saw/heard, that he was 'barely into playing the trumpet' was certainly a valid impression.

I would certainly not paint Ornette Coleman with the same brush, but Don Cherry showed no concern for tone, no concern for intonation, no concern for pitch, no concern for the audience, no concern for anything other than standing on stage and playing anything he could get out, and then presumably collecting his check and heading home after the performance.

And I've heard nothing of his on record which would change that assessment.

But then he's in the New Grove Dictionary of Jazz and I'm not (well, actually I am but it's a different me), so obviously there are many people who don't share my poor view of Don Cherry's trumpet playing ability.

--
David H. Bailey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

Reply via email to