> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David W. Fenton
> Sent: 03 May 2007 21:24
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [Finale] Conducting in 12/8
> 
> 
> On 3 May 2007 at 7:10, Owain Sutton wrote:
> 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David W. Fenton
> > > Sent: 02 May 2007 22:43
> > > To: [email protected]
> > > Subject: Re: [Finale] Conducting in 12/8
> 
> []
> 
> > > But what was described in the post was 12 
> undifferentiated beats. At 
> > > least, that was my understanding.
> > > 
> > > And I say that such a thing does not exist in music played (or
> > > perceived) by human beings.
> > > 
> > > --
> > > David W. Fenton  
> > 
> > Damn.  I thought the bar before the Glorifcation de L'Eule 
> in the Rite 
> > was thirteen, but I checked the score and it's in fact eleven.  So 
> > maybe twelve is the absolute cut-off beyond which we can't 
> conceive or 
> > perceive of non-emphasised beats.  (Wait, I just did 
> perceive them in 
> > my faulty memory, didn't I? ;) )
> 
> I defy any performer or listener to not group those 11 beats into 
> some accent pattern.
> 

OK, fine.  I've done that, as a listener.  Next challenge?


_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

Reply via email to