John Howell wrote:
[snip]> through speakers. My conclusion, after listening VERY
critically, was
that our Roland sounded just as good as the Steinway, when the Steinway
was miked, even though it would never come close to the actual acoustic
sound of the Steinway.
the problem in such situations is that the best amplification/microphone
combinations aren't always used.
A properly mic'd and amplified Steinway should sound like a Steinway,
and be very different sounding from a Roland.
But that runs into microphones which cost over $1000 each, and most live
amplification setups which groups like regional orchestras can afford
don't use that sort of equipment, choosing to use a couple or three
Shure SM57 mics.
--
David H. Bailey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
