I've been reading with interest the discussion of staff lists in Finale
2009, and I agree with Robert that the artifical limit of 4 staff lists
should be eliminated. Users should be able to create as many - or few -
staff lists as there are staff list-enabled expression categories.

The main advantage of staff lists over drag-apply is that you can use them
to display expressions differently in the score than in individual parts.
Certain text (like tempo markings) that should appear in every part usually
only needs to vertically appear once (or very few times) in the score. Staff
lists work great for situations like this.

Here's an example I read about: let's say you want to put a "Repeat Til Cue"
marking in the last measure of a short repeated section. You want it to
appear correctly in the score and in parts that are playing, but you don't
want it to break the multimeasure rest in parts that are resting. You could
enter it in the last measure and use a staff list to only show it on the
playing parts and score, and then enter it again in the first measure and
use a different staff list to only show it in the resting parts so it won't
break the multimeasure rests. Now, let's say you have several sections like
this in a piece, and a different group of instruments are playing/resting
each time. You can see how the four staff list limit would be a problem.

In my opinion, the biggest problem with staff lists in Finale 2009 is the
inability to name them, followed closely by having the artifical limit of
four staff lists - no matter how many or how few staff list-enabled
categories you have.

Another minor annoyance is the fact that clicking to the left of a staff
name in the Staff List dialog no longer checks both score and parts; you
have to manually mouse over and check both boxes.

Thank goodness there are still no staff list limits for text entered using
the Repeat tool. What's up with that?

Brian Williams

_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

Reply via email to