On 2009/09/10, at 21:59, Allen Fisher wrote:
And Fenton's correct...this just means there's a spot for it in the
spec...I was a member of the Unicode Consortium for awhile.
Me too. Not anymore since I don't get L10N jobs anymore. There was
such time 10 years ago. Why did I not do saving!! Stoopid.
If you have $150 you don't need and want to hear arguments about
characters in Burmese or what current glyphs can be combined to form
a character in ancient Hebrew...the UC is a great place to be ;-)
Not for me :-(
Unicode is created for English speaking programmers. It's great if
you are software engineer who needs I18N coding. I certainly
appreciate Unicode very much. But when I go back to deal with
Japanese, have to curse it since Japanese Kanji character table is
under Chinese subset. Not cool.
Nevertheless, Finale should be Unicode clean. It became minimum
requirement ever since OSX and NT5.
--
- Hiro
Hiroaki Honshuku, A-NO-NE Music, Greater Boston
http://a-no-ne.com http://anonemusic.com
_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
