the only thing in this particular situation that could reaonably be considered "tweaking outside 'standard' notation" is the last bit with the staff style -- hardly "a lot" (for me, less than 1 min to set up and then 10 seconds of work per instance) -- the rest i find is "totally" "standard" work for a mixed ensemble like you have in this score.
>OK. I just saw it. Yes that is what I am trying to get. Thanks for >your suggestions. Seems to me that is a lot of tweaking to get >something that is standard notation. > >On 30/09/2014, at 11:54, SN jef chippewa wrote: > > staff group 1: all instruments, no barline >> staff group 2: upper 4 instruments >> staff attributes on lead and CB set to break barlines between staves >> and break repeat barlines between staves >> >> staff style "barlines, don't break" - uncheck break barlines between >> staves and break repeat barlines between staves >> >> apply staff style to SC only for the lead and CB parts on selected >> end-of-system measures; do the same for ONLY the first half of the > > selected start-of-systems measures. -- shirling & neueweise new music notation + translation + arts management mailto:shirl...@newmusicnotation.com http://newmusicnotation.com | http://www.facebook.com/neueweise _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu https://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale To unsubscribe from finale send a message to: finale-unsubscr...@shsu.edu
