On 10/5/05, Daniel E. Macks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> KL Tah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Just a quick question to confirm ... if on the fink website, a package
> > is listed as 'not present' in the sub-column 'version' under column
> > 'Binary Distribution',
>
> That "Binary Distribution" pair of columns has confused lots of people
> ("it says 0.8.0 why can't I get it?"). Would it be better for packages
> that aren't in the bindist to omit the bindist number also (span the
> "not present" across both subcolumns)? Or maybe span "not present in
> 0.8.0" across both?
>
> dan
>
> --
> Daniel Macks
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.netspace.org/~dmacks
>I'd vote for option 2, though I think a different layout would be better--maybe I'll work on it on the way home. -- Alexander K. Hansen Fink Documenter [Day Job] Levitated Dipole Experiment http://psfcwww2.psfc.mit.edu/ldx/ ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions, and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl _______________________________________________ Fink-beginners mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-beginners
