-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > Alexander Hansen wrote: > > <snip> > >>>> grep: /sw/lib/libiconv.la: No such file or directory >>>> /sw/bin/sed: can't read /sw/lib/libiconv.la: No such file or directory >>>> libtool: link: `/sw/lib/libiconv.la' is not a valid libtool archive >>>> make[1]: *** [libJavaScriptCore.la] Error 1 > > webkit-1.0.2 was updated recently because of not finding libXt.dylib, > and this probably happened between your attempts. > > The package is looking a Fink .la file rather than one from Apple, which > is a more desirable state of affairs for Fink's purposes, since we > control the content. In this case using "fink rebuild libiconv-dev" > will regenerate that file for you. > > In general, whenever you find such a missing .la file from Fink now, you > should try > > dpkg -S [name of missing file] > > which will tell you what package it's from--since the files were > manually removed the database still contains information about them. > Then "fink rebuild [that package]" to regenerate the file. We use > "rebuild" rather than "reinstall" to guarantee that you're not > reinstalling a file that references Apple's now-missing .la files. > > Alternatively, if you're using the unstable tree, a fix has now been > implemented (just this week) for Apple's missing files. You can go > ahead and "fink reinstall" the package, and its .la files will > automatically be fixed up for you.
> OK, I did "fink rebuild libiconv-dev" and then re-ran > "fink selfupdate; fink update-all; fink cleanup" -- > a couple of hours later I got the too-long-for-my- > scroll-buffer error message again (back to that?) > ending with > ld: library not found for -lXt > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status > make[1]: *** [libwebkit-1.0.la] Error 1 > make: *** [all] Error 2 > ### execution of /var/tmp/tmp.1.P9jKFn failed, exit code 2 > Wondering what libXt is, I did > #dpkg -S libXt.la > dpkg: *libXt.la* not found. > # dpkg -S libXt.so > dpkg: *libXt.so* not found. > # dpkg -S libXt.dylib > dpkg: *libXt.dylib* not found. > Probably I am misusing dpkg. But what *is* libXt, anyway? > Which package should I "fink reinstall"? libiconv-dev ? > Do I *have* to use the unstable tree? I am not keen on > instabilities.... You're not misusing dpkg, except in the since that libXt.dylib is part of X11, and not of the Fink distro, so that dpkg can't know about it. I misdiagnosed what went on here--it must have been the removal of the Fink .la files that triggered the change in your build output. I just talked to the maintainer and the fix just got moved to stable, so after a selfupdate you'll see it (the revision isn't changed). - -- Alexander Hansen Fink User Liaison -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAktOdn8ACgkQB8UpO3rKjQ8bFQCffydhYsQSn9RuuRuHj1oKHgce 3qMAn0+8SOhrScA4vYE4pqbNgyfJgRl4 =J93b -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Throughout its 18-year history, RSA Conference consistently attracts the world's best and brightest in the field, creating opportunities for Conference attendees to learn about information security's most important issues through interactions with peers, luminaries and emerging and established companies. http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsaconf-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Fink-beginners mailing list [email protected] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.beginners
