Hi Max.  I'm testing your new zlib, and it works great.  In both of the
packages I depended which depend on zlib, at the outset, otool -L gave
  /sw/lib/libz.1.dylib (compat. 1.1.3, current 1.1.3)

Then I installed the new zlib and everything still ran.

Then I recompiled my packages; now otill -L gives
  /usr/lib/libz.1.1.3.dylib (compat. 1.0.0, current 1.1.3)

Everything still runs.

Here is my question, though.  Do you know why the library got listed as
libz.1.dylib before, but now it is getting listed at libz.1.1.3.dylib?
It seems to me that it is more robust, for possible future upgrades,
if the otool listing gives libfoo.N.dylib (which is of course a symlink
to libfoo.N.x.y.dylib).

  -- Dave




_______________________________________________
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

Reply via email to