On Monday, March 25, 2002, at 08:14 PM, Max Horn wrote:
> At 13:35 Uhr +0900 25.03.2002, Peter O'Gorman wrote: >> I have one suggestion for this. When you have built everything >> with nothing installed, you should build again with everything >> installed. Building twice like this will find both missing >> Depends and Conflicts... >> >> I think it is a great idea. > > The idea is great, but sadly, reality is a bit different. For > example, how do you define "everything installed" ? In fact, it > is techincally impossible to install every Fink package at > once, since some conflict. Don't even suggest to work through > all possible combinations, as I said already in my previous > mail to Kaben: we have 1 week for this, not an entier life time. Good point, I still think a reasonable set of packages could be made that would deal with your technical impossibility, but I don't have a solution for the build times... Wait, why don't you use all the money that fink has generated in sales to buy a couple of high-end Macs? :) Peter _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
