Max Horn [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > I am fully with you on this. I stated similar concerns about this in > the past but was overruled. In any case now it's not to late to undo > this, if we can agree on it, even with relatively little pain. > > However, first we need to evaluate in how far shared libs of this are > required for the correct working of KDE, and if they are required, > why so, and what we can do to make KDE happy with static libs of > them. One of those more directly involved into the KDE porting > (Benjamin, etc.) should comment on this.
Well, part of the problem is that I was not even aware of the issue until all 300 meg of binaries had already been built, over the span of 2 days, and there was no way in hell I was building everything again. =) Knowing that things have changed now, it is very likely that the KDE build can be changed to use the non-dynamic versions of Xinerama and Xv... -- Benjamin Reed a.k.a. Ranger Rick ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://ranger.befunk.com/ ...if humanoids eat chicken, then obviously they'd eat their own species. Otherwise they'd just be picking on the chickens. -- Kryten _______________________________________________________________ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
