Brian:  I don't think you need the "No fortran" option - the vanilla
LAM-MPI package could depend on g77, the LAM-MPI-absoft variant could
depend on system-fortran.  I think absoft has the capability of linking
g77 libs, so in theory you could get away with one package.
Unfortunately, I've never been able to get this to work.

-Jeff


 On Sat, 12 Oct 2002, Brian W. Barrett wrote:

> Hello all -
>
> After the recent discussion about MPI (Message Passing Interface)
> implementations in Fink, I've decided to package up LAM/MPI for Fink.  I'm
> not sure what the "right thing" to do for the Fortran interface is...
> there are currently three options, one of which must be chosen at build
> time.
>
> * No Fortran
> * Fink's g77 support
> * Fink's system-fortran (ie, Absoft)
>
> Is there any way to deal with this better than having three seperate LAM
> packages?  I'm guessing not, but...
>
> Brian
>
>

-- 
Jeffrey S. Whitaker         Phone : (303)497-6313
NOAA/OAR/CDC  R/CDC1        FAX   : (303)497-6449
325 Broadway                Web   : http://www.cdc.noaa.gov/~jsw
Boulder, CO, USA 80305-3328 Office: Skaggs Research Cntr 1D-124



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

Reply via email to