Martin Costabel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > David R. Morrison wrote: > > > [] > > What my "fix" does is to alter the .pax.gz file with the contents of the > > installation so that the permission on "." is 1755 in the directory > > instead of 0700. > > What did you do with the bom file? Not only does it still contain the > permissions 700 for ".", but lsbom crashes when I try to run it with > options "lsbom -p MUGf" on it. > > Unfortunately, the bad permissions that get installed upon a secondary > installation are taken from the bom file. The result is that the new > installer has the same problem as the old one.
I didn't do anything with the bom file, because I don't know how to modify it. My problem is, that I have no way to access 10.1 before next Monday, and the 10.2 PackageMaker makes 10.2-only .pkg's, which is not what we want. So I attempted to punt by just altering the .pax.gz file. Not the right thing, obviously! Any other suggestions? Maybe somebody else can make a new 0.4.1 installer? I'll be happy to talk you through the process... -- Dave ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Influence the future of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now. http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?sunm0004en _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
