On Saturday, November 9, 2002, at 06:55 PM, Max Horn wrote:
As an maybe interesting sidenote, on my system that is cleanly bootstrapped with the modified fink from CVS, I do not get any prebinding-warning messages anymore... can anybody confirm/deny this?
Not sure about that, but...
Yeah, I experimented with this a bit, but it's not terribly useful for what we're doing. We talked about it on #opendarwin a bit and what turns out it's really for is prebinding stuff that gets stripped afterwards. It'll be too big at link time, but will fit into the segment after stripping.Also I found this in the ld man page, it looks very useful, too: -prebind_allow_overlap Have the static linker, ld(1), prebind the output even if the addresses of the dynamic libraries it uses overlap. The resulting output can then have redo_prebinding(1) run on it to fix up the prebind- ing after the overlapping dynamic libraries have been rebuilt. This option can also be specified by setting the environment variable LD_PRE- BIND_ALLOW_OVERLAP.
You still have to manually re-prebind it later, with update_prebinding, which is not automatic. You still need to provide a segment address, at which point it's just as easy to do it the right way the first time. =)
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
