Well, after thinking about this for a few hours, I've reached the opposite conclusion. I think we will have a more powerful system if we change the format of the Shlibs field to include the compatibility version.
Here's how it would work (very similar to debian, actually: see http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-sharedlibs.html ). The Shlibs field would have entries such as %p/lib/libfoo.1.dylib 2.0.1 %n (>= 1.2.3-1) This indicates that this package provides a library whose install-name is %p/lib/libfoo.1.dylib and whose compatibility-version is 2.0.1 . It also indicates that the earliest version of the package which provide this library with that compatibility-version was 1.2.3-1. If the fink package is upgraded but the compatibility number of this library is unchanged, then the next version of the .info file has the very same Shlibs field. (The Shlibs field should only change if the compatibility-version changes.) The advantage of this approach is less forced rebuilding of libraries by users. So long as a user has a version of the package installed which provides a library meeting the minimum compatibility version required, the library package won't need to be rebuilt. (Under the previous strategy, rebuilding would happen often, because we were using (>= %v-%r) typically, and we couldn't avoid this because the compatibility-version might change.) Another advantage is that, like the debian shlibs format, this has three fields: name, version-number, package-data. Due to differences between ELF and Mach-O, the formats of these fields are different; however, it may be easier to construct a version of dpkg-shlibs which works with both debian and fink, with this greater parallel between formats. Any thoughts? -- Dave ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: To learn the basics of securing your web site with SSL, click here to get a FREE TRIAL of a Thawte Server Certificate: http://www.gothawte.com/rd524.html _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel