On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, David wrote: ><snip> > >> >> Why don't you just do it? >Because I really do not feel like triggering a flood of protest. >Changing the site "layout" is considered a pretty "big" step by me and >I really do not feel that settled within the project yet that people >would simply accept my decision to do so.
I think changing site layout is a big step. more so if it moves things around, less so if it just changes fonts and padding a bit... >> We might decide to convert it to a pure CSS site one of these day (I'd >> be all for it). >> >Well here is the famous "me too" I am just not sure which browsers wont >like that depends heavily on what you do. Netscape 4 and IE 3 have pretty sorry implementations of CSS so you have to do a bunch of hacking around them (this has been documented by all-CSS sites like http://www.alistapart.com when they switched) and implementation of the cooler features is still a bit patchy. But I wrote basic commercial sites in 1999 with all-CSS they were ok. (I am sympathetic to people who say "I don't want to change from iCab to KDE, I will live with the lack of 'float'", but I am also happier than many to say "if you use foo3.5 when foo7.2 is available and doesn't have the bugs your old version does, upgrade or tell someone who cares...") cheers Chaals ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: Thawte.com Understand how to protect your customers personal information by implementing SSL on your Apache Web Server. Click here to get our FREE Thawte Apache Guide: http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0029en _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
