Le vendredi, 17 jan 2003, à 16:37 Europe/Paris, David R. Morrison a écrit :
In a discussion on #fink today, we arrived at the following plan. A
non-opensource license would either be labeled
License: Restrictive
(as done currently), or
License: Restrictive/Distributable
The second one would be used when it is OK for Fink to distribute a binary,
even though the license has some restrictions.
Comments?
sounds good to me -- zauc
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: Thawte.com - A 128-bit supercerts will allow you to extend the highest allowed 128 bit encryption to all your clients even if they use browsers that are limited to 40 bit encryption. Get a guide here:http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0030en _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
