On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 04:30:32PM -0500, David R. Morrison wrote:
> > Shouldn't system-perl simply put in a /usr/bin/perl -> /sw/bin/perl symlink?
> > That seems much easier.
> 
> Unfortunately, that runs contrary to fink's policy of not modifying /usr
> but confining itself to /sw (with the sole exception of a fink-installed
> xfree86).

No no, have system-perl do ln -s /usr/bin/perl /sw/bin/perl.  So /sw/bin/perl
exists and points to /usr/bin/perl.  That way both #!/sw/bin/perl and
#!/usr/bin/perl both work and use the Apple installed Perl.  /usr isn't
touched.


-- 
Michael G Schwern        [EMAIL PROTECTED]  http://www.pobox.com/~schwern/
<GuRuThuG> make a channel called #Perl, and infest it with joking and 
           fun.... it doesnt make alot of sense.


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive?  Does it
help you create better code?   SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
YOU!  Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
_______________________________________________
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

Reply via email to