Re: [Fink-devel] Phasing out references to Mac OS X 10.1 (Doc Maintainers?)

[Alexander K. Hansen]

One place where we shouldn't touch the existing reference is the 
package database page:  10.1 users should have available exactly what 
versions of packages exist for them.

Unless we want just to have a separate 10.1-specific document which 
includes that information.  That would involve a fair amount of effort, 
but could be done.

On Thursday, November 20, 2003, at 02:11 PM, Darian Lanx wrote:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160
David R. Morrison wrote:

I disagree.  As far as I know, our 10.1 distribution still works.  
Anyone
who bought a Mac or a copy of OS X prior to September 2002 and who did
not choose to pay for an upgrade will still be running 10.1.
We can de-emphasize it, sure, but it is already de-emphasized.
  -- Dave
It is no longer supported thus there should be no mention of it on the 
main pages and all over the web-site. I am not opposed to making a "no 
longer supported" page.

Just my two cents.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (Darwin)
iD8DBQE/vRHbiW/Ta/pxHPQRAy84AKC9Pw7OUGbpGQAV/a3U7tUuiJezZACgleXB
s9zyUdNzLDBZ4XI54q2oQS8=
=Wy0z
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive?  Does it
help you create better code?  SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
YOU!  Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
_______________________________________________
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel