Is there a reason for having both openssl-* and openssl097* packages in the 10.3 distribution?
I'm using the Fink 0.6.2 .pkg release with OS 10.3.1 + Xcode Update 2003-11-03
and the openssl (0.9.6j-1) package fails to compile. No problem says I, since
the openssl097 .info file says it provides the same thing, and even obsoletes
the older version.
Yet even with the openssl097-* packages compiled and installed, packages that depend on openssl-* trigger fink to try to download and compile the broken packages (ie, squid-ssl)
Do I need to sidegrade to the CVS version of fink for the ssl packages?
-dean takemori
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
