On Jan 5, 2004, at 4:28 PM, Daniel Macks wrote:
Wouldn't the fink package naming scheme (i.e., use of Revision) take care of that? I can't remember seeing a fink package handled as %n-%v (interacting with outside tarballs maybe, but not within the fink world's package manager code nor info files). But if we want to get paranoid, what about %r="fink-1"?
If the version is distributed without modifications, just leave it as is. If there are any modifications, modify the version() function in lft.c
Jeremy
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
