Matthias Neeracher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [snip]
> However, the package installs a framework, for which I think we don't > currently have a precedent. So my questions are: > > - Do y'all agree that frameworks are, in principle, fink packageable > matter? > - Where should frameworks be installed? /sw/lib/Frameworks ? > /sw/lib/frameworks ? /sw/Frameworks? /sw/frameworks? /sw/lib/sw? > I agree with Martin: if we need to extend the FHS, we should do it in parallel to the way Apple did it. So we should use /sw/Library/Frameworks or /sw/System/Library/Frameworks, probably the former. (I don't understand the distinction between /System/Library/Frameworks and /Library/Frameworks in Apple's setup...) -- Dave ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
