On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 02:45:59PM +0100, Darian Lanx wrote: > Daniel Macks wrote: > <snip all> > > > >Thoughts? > > To put it short and please do not see this as completely useless > critique. This is too complicated for my taste. [...] But you can > hardly expect the majority of the Mac community that might be > willing to learn and grow into packaging to learn much about regular > expressions.
The simpler version of the idea is just a simple string equality test: Depends: (%type_perl_version 5.8.1) thing-pm Depends: (X%type_nox X) x11 Either tho two strings are the same (so the package is kept as a dependency) or they are not (in which case the it is not). Although the second example is kinda shell-ugly. > This is partly my personal opinion, partly an opinion as someone who > wants to keep things simple so that we do not slide into a > documentation, explanation, support nightmare. Makes sense. That's why I'm here looking for improvements rather than already off wading through Fink:: :). Thanks for the feedback, dan -- Daniel Macks [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.netspace.org/~dmacks ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
