It's not hard!

I was firstly curious why the packages weren't compliant with the python policy, and then I found out that the package I had put into 10.3/unstable had been removed and replaced with an obsolete and uncompliant version!!!

In the meantime, I'll just move the packages from 10.2-gcc3.3 to 10.3...

On 29 Feb 2004, at 16:42, Ben Hines wrote:

Um.. this all started with me asking you to move everything to 10.3/stable. I don't see why its so hard. I'll just do it.

-Ben

On Feb 28, 2004, at 7:14 PM, Jeremy Higgs wrote:


Hmmm... well that is a bit of a kludge, but it's an old version. 10.2-gcc3.3 has newer (compliant, I hope) versions. Who knows why I didn't transfer them across..


Looking back in the CVS commits, gnome-python-1.4.2-1.info was removed in late October last year (27/10, my time)... gnome-python-py23 was also added on the 3rd November to the 10.3 tree by Ben Hines, and I've edited it a couple of times since then. gnome-python-py23 was removed from 10.3/unstable by Keith Konger on the 10/1/04 with the GNOME 2.4.2 commit... I don't know why, though, you'd have to ask him.

Anyway, should I move gnome-python-py2* back to 10.3/unstable, and remove the obsolete package?




------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

Reply via email to