The more I think about it, the more I think that %n should be used for the truncated name. That currently shows up in lots of places; not only the patch file, but often in the Source: line and so on.
I think we need a %versioned_name type of percent field for the fully expanded name. On the other hand, the name of the "parent", as represented by %N, should probably be the versioned name of the parent. (This would allow splitoffs within variant packages to function as they do now.) I can't think of a reason you would need the unversioned name of the parent. -- Dave ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
