-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: RIPEMD160
Kyle Moffett wrote:
On Mar 30, 2004, at 20:56, Alexander Strange wrote:
The Gimp 2.0 isn't a ripoff because I haven't finished the package yet. He does provide the original Gimp sources, but if the "application bundle" contains anything else it would need to be published as well (but it's not a violation until someone asks him and he refuses, I believe).
He only provides a link to the sources on a GIMP mirror, whereas the GPL requires him to properly host the source on his own server.
^^^^^^^^
Actually that is not quite clear. Even our 5 lawyers cannot pin it down if you only have to provide a liunk, if you have to throw CD's at people or host the sources on your own ressources.
- -d :) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFAatUuPMoaMn4kKR4RAzOfAKCA7mf7eWgL4wcuDvVZFh2wBLs3QQCfW2vs tdD0heABNM3LV8KsIYQ7O98= =Y0kH -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
