> I would just depend on db 4.2, since earlier version (4.0, 4.1) had  
> serious problems on Mac OS X (especially on multiprocessor
> machines).

thanks for the tip. no known issues with 4.2 I hope ? (I've bad
memories of picking a dependency that was just painful to support
afterwards)

> Look how other packages did that. If it installes into pyhton version  
> specific locations (e.g. /sw/lib/python2.3) you will need to build a  
> package (maybe splitt off) for each python version. If you build a  
> split off you should name it -py23 (or -py22).

If I don't support more than one db, this looks like the way to go.

> I think it should be fine to just have a version for python 2.3.

Okay. I'll have a look at the suggested packages, and post my first
version soon.

Frédéric

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to