> I would just depend on db 4.2, since earlier version (4.0, 4.1) had > serious problems on Mac OS X (especially on multiprocessor > machines).
thanks for the tip. no known issues with 4.2 I hope ? (I've bad memories of picking a dependency that was just painful to support afterwards) > Look how other packages did that. If it installes into pyhton version > specific locations (e.g. /sw/lib/python2.3) you will need to build a > package (maybe splitt off) for each python version. If you build a > split off you should name it -py23 (or -py22). If I don't support more than one db, this looks like the way to go. > I think it should be fine to just have a version for python 2.3. Okay. I'll have a look at the suggested packages, and post my first version soon. Frédéric
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature