Still users could have it from their old installs, still installed. 4
is fine, If you are going to change the name it should be 4 or 5 but
not nothing. And it shouldn't conflict with the old once since they
don't conflict or replace. If you replace/conflict an older shlib major
with a new one with different vers. package you will BREAK compiled
apps. (the thing they are linked against will go away, and the app
won't run anymore)
-Ben
On Jun 13, 2004, at 3:40 PM, TheSin wrote:
well the old one shoudl never have made 10.3
and that is why I didn't move it yet.
and it shouldn't be 5, the policy is very confusing and my pkgs are
all messed up because of it, I thought that too but I was told by
others it should be the file name version ie 4 in this case since it's
libdvdnav.4.dylib. Anyhow that policy should indeed be clarified but
i vote for 4, makes more sense to be, since the Shlibs field deals
with compat.
---
TS
http://southofheaven.org
Chaos is the beginning and end, try dealing with the rest.
On 13-Jun-04, at 4:27 PM, Ben Hines wrote:
The old package should remain, and the new package should be called
'libdvdnav5-shlibs' to comply with the shlibs policy.
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the new InstallShield X.
From Windows to Linux, servers to mobile, InstallShield X is the
one installation-authoring solution that does it all. Learn more and
evaluate today! http://www.installshield.com/Dev2Dev/0504
_______________________________________________
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
